From the office of Congressman Andy Harris:
The National Federation of Independent Business, the nation’s leading small business association, today named U.S. Rep. Andy Harris (MD-1) a Guardian of Small Business for his outstanding voting record on behalf of America’s small-business owners in the 112th Congress.
NFIB President and CEO Dan Danner praised Rep. Harris for “standing for small business.” In presenting the group’s coveted Guardian of Small Business Award, Danner said, “Small-business owners pay close attention to how their lawmakers vote on the issues affecting their businesses and employees and stand by those who stand for them.”
“The record shows that Rep. Harris is a true champion of small business, having stood strong on the key small-business votes in the 112th Congress,” said Danner. “This award reflects our members’ appreciation for supporting the NFIB pro-growth agenda for small business.”
In all, NFIB will present Guardian awards to 245 Representatives who voted favorably on key small business issues at least 70 percent of the time during the 112th Congress.
Bruce O'H. says
They didn’t build those businesses…(sarc)
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
They didn’t build the roads, police protection, educational institutions, bank regulations, and everything needed for a society. At least try to think about what was said.
Bruce O'H. says
Their TAXES paid for those things. The roads were NOT there first. In fact, in the earliest days of our country, the people and businesses DID clear and create wagon trails to move their products. It was only after we achieved true prosperity through free market commerce that your god, the government, was able to afford to pave and maintain those roads.
Because the people and businesses SUPPLIED the funds to do so.
If we follow your logic, then, conversely, if a business fails, we could blame it on the roads and teachers and policemen, then, also.
I know what Obama said, and I know the ideology behind it.
…and please, try to curb your egotistical view that only those that hold your misguided, never successful, political ideology, know how to think. Your hubris is disgusting.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
And Bruce your ignorance of history is disgusting. Our founding fathers, e.g. Washington and Hamilton, fought for and won a Federalist Government with which we govern today. The taxes that you refer to come mostly from the CITIZENS. These taxes are spent the way we want them to.
The Tea Party doesn’t understand that the original Tea Bag protests from Boston were NOT about taxes, but about taxes without REPRESENTATION which we enjoy today. Our choice is who will enjoy the fruit of those taxes: the 1% like your side wants or the 99% that my wants?
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
mine wants
B says
And you are blinded to the never ending attempts to reign in that federalist government, and the freedom it takes away, starting with Thomas Jefferson. Don’t claim a victory won when you don’t believe in the document produced from that victory. I love history lessons from a communist.
And the percentage of the country that believes in your ultra liberal crap is way less then 99%.
Bruce O'H. says
Who are you to tell me what I know of history, or that I, for some demented reason in your mind, want all wealth to benefit the, so called, 1% ?
That’s the problem with Leftists, there is no middle ground. It’s either their radical , society destroying, far Left views, or, they say, some extreme alternative that no one else is, in reality, is calling for.
As for taxes being paid by the citizens…have you determined that “evil” business owners are NOT citizens?
I have no more time for your juvenile theories or arguments. Your beliefs are based on puerile ideology to the exclusion of facts and reason.
Your pen name might as well read PROUD TO BE A SOCIALIST FOOL.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
Oh it so much better to be a Fascist Pig.
B says
Once again you don’t know what you are talking about. Fascism is about state control with a strong central leader, which conservatives are against.
David A. Porter says
I just came back from an extended trip through Montana and Idaho. The areas I visited were also visited by the Corps of Discovery in and around 1805. A government funded scientific operation to explore the vast unknown wilderness of the recently purchased Louisiana Purchase. I believe the funds were provided by the United States government for the original purchase and the funds for the expedition were also provided by the United States government under Thomas Jefferson. The whole purpose of exploring that new territory was for the potential it offered for discovering a water passage to the Pacific Coast (denied by the Continental Divide) and learning what was there for potential economic exploitation. I drove on a lot of public roads there. It was awesome. I suspect you might be able to learn something from a similar experience.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
Dave, That is a good example of how the Government helps us by doing its job. I’ve been there and it is truly wonderful.
B says
Another great example that doesn’t fit the facts for your side. The louisiana purchase occurred during a time of reduction in government spending, size, and repeal of many taxes. The purchase was PAID FOR because of the availability of funding due to high federal income vs lower spending. The government wasn’t in debt up to its ears because of Jeffersons small government policies, and was able to reap the benefits of an obvious bargain.
You two should at least do some research before you post.
David A. Porter says
B…. such a wonderful representation of the Louisiana Purchase as something that fits into your mindset. And here I was all awash with the notion that it wasn’t simply an expenditure based on available monies. How foolish of me not to reduce it a simple monetary transaction instead of an opportunity to further the development of the United States. Tell me, is this how you look at all things: a balance sheet with either income or expense? What is your notion of the civil war. Was it conducted primarily to assure steady federal taxes from a bunch of rebellious states? By the way, the Confederation failed in part because of their inability to organize, their lack of resources especially when confronting the very powerful North, which managed to blockade southern ports, occupy the west, occupy Maryland and secure the perimeter of Washington DC. Are you really on the purely mercenary side of history?
B says
Again David, a little research into the economy pre and during Jefferson backs my position. Entering office with enormous debt, his policies of cutting government, cutting taxes, and spending wisely put us in a strong financial position. I am saying that since the government was living with in its means, and in a strong financial position, it was able to act when such a great deal came about. If Canada somehow became available tomorrow for purchase for a great price, would we be able to purchase it in the financial mess the country is currently in? No. Therefore, the louisiana purchase would not be possible with your big government free spending ideals that are currently running us into bankruptcy. Your example of how great big government is, was only made possible by conservative governing.
Good side bar about the civil war, but it proves nothing.
David A. Porter says
Interestingly, the conservative approach permitted Napoleon to engage in continental war in Europe, which was opposed by Britain. Not that they would ever be angry at us for helping him finance his ambitions. I suppose that was also part of the plan.
B says
The Democratic-Republicans, with their base in the rural South, won the hard-fought election of 1800; the Federalists never returned to power. The Federalists, too wedded to an upper-class style to win the support of ordinary voters,[original research?] grew weaker year by year. They recovered some strength by intense opposition to the War of 1812; they practically vanished during the Era of Good Feelings that followed the end of the war in 1815.[2] Wiki
Ironic how you support the 99% now, yet champion the 1% in your argument. Maybe you should understand history before making up your own. Very typical liberal move.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
Just like a tea party to cherry pick his facts. “This document (the Federalist) will provide all the reasons to support the new plan of government described in the U.S. Constitution, and responses to each of the criticisms of the plan. Opponents to the new plan criticize it most on it creating a strong central government that will be abusive to individual liberty. However, an energetic government is crucial to the protection of individual liberty. The plan of government under the Articles of Confederation was unable to effectively protect individual liberties because it did not act directly upon the people, and had no authority to enforce its laws.”
Now Wiki does point out how it evolved, but my point remains intact. The founding fathers, and especially Madison the father of our Constitution, knew a strong central government was essential to survival. Maybe you should delve a little deeper into history before trying to argue?
Moreover, the fact remains that your party favors the rich and not working people.
Bruce O'H. says
To: I’M A PROUD SOCIALIST FOOL…
I’m a Constitutional Conservative. A Moderate/Centrist on the political spectrum. It’s impossible for me to be a Fascist, as that ideology is a facet of the Left.
Which is why Obama and Jeffrey Imeld (sp?) of GE are a perfect representation of Fascism.
While you, sir, are a baseless defamer, throwing out inflammatory, irrational, rhetoric that has no place in reality.
Now, you could easily say that I started it by calling you a Socialist fool…BUT…all of your positions are pro-Socialist, so that is not a slur, just the truth, you are a Socialist.
Just as you being a fool for believing in that ideology is true.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
“Communism stands for a stateless society where all are equal. No one is rich or poor in a communist system. In Communism, it is the community that holds the production and the major resources. On the other hand…Fascism believes in nationalism (includes economic nationalism), corporatism (includes economic planning), militarism and totalitarianism (dictatorship and social interventionism).” “Fascism opposes multiple ideologies: conservatism, liberalism, and two major forms of socialism — communism and social democracy…It promotes regulated private enterprise and private property contingent whenever beneficial to the nation.” In other words, it seems to me that corporations control Fascism and the Government works for them. That is what happened in Germany.
See also: ” Fascism and Big Business is a book first written in 1936 by…Daniel Guérin. The book, which was written before the Second World War broke out, examines the development of Nazism in Germany and fascism in Italy and its relationship with the capitalist families there. Its main thesis is that Fascism supported the heavy industrial sector (represented in Germany by Krupp, Emil Kirdorf, etc.) to the detriment of lighter industrial sectors, dedicated to building consumer goods. It points out the failure of “corporatism,” which in effect meant the dismantling of trade unions and worker’s inability to elect their own representatives, who were nominated instead by the fascists.”
B says
It wasn’t the Republicans that bailed out wall street yesterday with QE3. Barack Obama raised more from wall street then any previous presidential candidate. You really want to talk about cherry picking facts? A large portion of the democratic party is made up of people living off of the government yet you support the “working” class? How much success can you have as a member of that “working” class until you are demonized by liberal dopes like you?
The founding fathers did agree that a strong federal government was essential, yet they created limitations on that government in the form of the Constitution. Liberals like yourself disregard and twist the meaning of that document and support a federal government way stronger then those limitations placed on it. You like the idea of a federal government but dislike the limitations placed on it and ignore our constitution.
I didn’t have to delve to far into history to show that you were twisting facts to support your marxist positions. In fact, I proved quite easily that you were hypocritical in supporting the so called 99%, yet touting the virtues of the 1% from years gone by,
The larger the government becomes, the more individual freedoms the individual sacrifices.
Here is the most important fact you don’t seem to understand. Conservatives don’t need Liberals. Liberals however. need conservatives to pay for their policies and protect them.
Monster says
Great posts, B and Bruce O. That socialist will rewrite history if he gets the chance. He needs to read further. What PTBL said is partly true, but goes much further than his research in Wikipedia. B great summation of real history. Thank you.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
B: You have swallowed to party line hook, line and sinker. Give me an example of me “…like the idea of a federal government but dislike the limitations placed on it and ignore our constitution.” It is the GOP that has created a larger government by privatizing many of its function to for-profit companies and using our hard earned taxes to pay for them. Do you think Romney is alone in cheating on taxes by not paying any or “13%”? Do you really think it is fair that he and many of the 1% can hide funds off shore and then expect hard working middleclass to make up the difference? It is the very height of ludicrousness to say “Liberals however. need conservatives to pay for their policies and protect them” when it is the other way around.
Bruce O'H. says
@ PROUD TO BE A SOCIALIST FOOL…
You do know that the 13% tax rate is on capital gains, right? In other words, a person pays the normal tax rate of, say 33% on income. They then invest part of their net, after that income tax, into investments. They then pay 13% tax on interest or dividends earned from that investment.
Are you REALLY this dumb, ignorant and uninformed, or are you a paid troll to poison peoples minds for the extreme Left?
Your class warfare rhetoric is ridiculous.
Truthfully, are you a teenager? You sure sound like one.
Bruce Doh says
You realize that we don’t know WHAT exactly is being discussed since Romney hasn’t released his returns, right?
I’m all for giving him the benefit of the doubt but if it walks like a duck….
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
Bruce O;H: I’m sorry but I have a policy of not engaging with a##holes who are only capable of ARGUMENTUM AD HOMINEM arguments. Sorry, I have better things to do. You’ll have to rage with your tea party brethren.
Bruce O'H. says
@ PROUD TO BE A SOCIALIST FOOL…
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! Typical Leftist tactic. Don’t answer with counter FACTS…ditch the argument and attack the messenger. Which rule of Alinsky’s is that? I believe it may fall under rule #5…
Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.
You are pitiful.
PS, Romney released two years of taxes. That’s all you and your hyena media get to dig through to come up with fabricated lies and talking points.
People have caught on that lies are the only way that you can advance the cancer, on the body politic, that your treasonous beliefs are.
David A. Porter says
I believe his tax records for 2011 were an estimate. It isn’t finalized. There’s story working around the internet that he asked Paul Ryan for ten years of his taxes. Mr Ryan complied.
B says
You have no proof he cheated on taxes. That is a lie you and your ilk spread since you cannot defend the failed policies of this president. Wouldn’t the IRS have gone after him if he had cheated? I am actually surprised that Obama hasn’t sent the IRS after him, since he has sunk so low to threaten polling agencies. Many Democrats have off shore accounts, as well as the hollywood elite you love so much. If Mitt Romney is investing in foreign companies, why would he not have foreign accounts to keep money in. He is successful in every thing he does, and understands money and the economy way better then our present leader (or should I say not present). Democrats are trying to demonize him for being successful when he has accomplished what everyone hopes for. Actually look at what Obama has done and even with your hard head, there must be a hint of doubt in there.
I say Romney should trade his taxes for Obamas college transcript and the records for Fast and furious.
As far as swallowing party line, simply not true. I voted for Clinton in the past as i have stated before, and voted for a couple local democrats. I choose who I feel is the right person for the position. I also think that Bush failed in his duties in regards to the economy, although he tried to right the housing bubble early on and was smacked down by Frank and Dodd.
You have shown no ability to be objective. Like all liberals, you are scared of life and need the big brother security blanket to make you feel secure. Larger government by privatizing its functions? Do you even read the bs you write?
Do you really think that the hardworking middle class works any harder then many of the so called 1%. Your jealousy of those that succeed is obvious. You are a thief and hide your desire for other peoples money in big government belief.
If you hate this country so much, why wouldn’t you go to one that shares your beliefs? I hear Greece and Italy are wonderful.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
B: All Romney need do is to share his highly secretive and incriminating tax returns. What is he hiding? And you should not make conclusions about me. I am very comfortable, but I believe we should help those less fortunate and not exploit them as many tea baggers are wont to believe should be done. They love to kick a man when he is down instead of giving him a helping hand. And these are the very people who just love to tell you what wonderful Christians they are. ROTFLMAO
You should move to your country of choice: “Too much government? Too many taxes? Move to Somalia.” I hear there is no government regulation there and you would thrive.
Bruce O'H. says
Ahh, so you subscribe to using the vile homosexual pejorative for the Tea Party, AND you are a bigot against Christians.
The much touted, and non-existent, mask of Leftist tolerance always slips off at some point in any extended conversation with you closet haters.
We understand who you people really are, now. Don’t you get that?
You will in November. It’ll be worse than 2010 was for you.
B says
Look into how much Romney has given to charity. How about Biden? How about Obama?
We have “given” billions and there are still poor. Give them jobs and watch the change. Give a man a fish/ Teach him how to fish.
“They love to kick a man when he is down instead of giving him a helping hand.
Another lie. How about you give facts instead of party line comrade
Romney already gave what he is required to for taxes.
I would never leave this country. I love it and all it stands for, and I would never apologize for being an American.
B says
Over $800,000 in taxes are owed by Obama administration, and way over 3 billion is owed by federal employees. Where is you outrage over that.
The tax allegations you claim for Romney shows you have no faith in the IRS yet all you want is more government. Make up your mind.
All of the examples I have shown you make it clear that you are a partisan hack, and nothing more.
David A. Porter says
Germany’s pretty good too… and they have a national health care system, good roads and an excellent mass transit system and a thriving economy. One of those other disturbing examples of European Socialism doing fine in spite of their influx of immigrants from other nations. Visit there sometime… you might fall in love with the place. I liked it so much I wondered why we couldn’t have the same thing here.
Ill informed conjecture and dissent follows:
Bruce O'H. says
MR. PORTER says…”I believe his tax records for 2011 were an estimate. It isn’t finalized. There’s a story working around the internet that he asked Paul Ryan for ten years of his taxes. Mr Ryan complied.”
MY REPLY…I believe Obama was a “D” student in college, that’s just an estimate, until he proves me wrong.
ALSO…There’s a story working around the internet that Obama is a gay tea bagger, you know, a REAL tea bagger!!!
David A. Porter says
Wow Bob, I know what I said… glad you could repeat it for emphasis. Tell me is it because he’s a smart black man that he bothers you so much? Not like that dimwitted white man that screwed this country up over eight years. And you were asleep during that time I suppose. YOu know.. elelctive war that wasn’t going to cost a dime… and the war we were justified for ignored so the bad man could hide away and wait for this guy to take him out. I don’t care what his grades were Bob. If you don’t like his job it wouldn’t matter where he was born or if he was a D student or using foreign student aid to gain his education. The simple reason you’re so sore is because he’s in charge and it just rides up your backside like a giant wedgy that you can’t pull out. Go on Bob, it’s clear what your problem is.
B says
David, thats all you’ve got?
Right to the racist claims. The fail safe of a lib who can’t defend the failures of this president. I suppose you would tell me that Obama is still great with foreign policy as the middle east burns.
I am amazed how focused you libs are on Bush. Mr. Porter likes to rewrite history like every other liberal to suite his cause.
Lets get right to it. Mr. Porter supports Obama because his government position is safe, and would be cut under someone with fiscal sanity.
Edumacation says
Times change and our constitution is flexible enough to change with it, thus the reason it has survived. We can function under the same guiding rules of 200 years ago but we cannot expect the details to remain exactly the same.
The constitution stays but political parties come and go.
The two current prevailing parties have worn out their usefullness spouting the same old tired tripe from its leaders and members.
If you are not a democrat by 20 then you are heartless.
If you are not a republican by 40 then your brainless.
If you buy the crap slung by either party your just gullible.
Monster says
Dagger, why is my earlier comment praising B and Bruce awaiting moderation?
Q says
If I had to guess, you probably said something racist.
Monster says
Q., read what I wrote. Now if I called you an asshole, that might be different.
Monster says
Q., are you still lurking out there? I miss you. Please post.
Bruce O'H. says
Mr Porter, you are an ill person…
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
This whole issue about the President’s birth certificate is just a racist smear. Obama could have been born on Mars and still been a citizen as his mother was BORN IN THE USA. “A Child Born Outside the U.S.(Hawaii was a state since August 21, 1959, but just for this argument let me show that it would make no difference) is a Citizen at Birth IF… One parent is a U.S. citizen at the time of birth and the birth date is before November 14, 1986 but after October 10, 1952 (Barack Obama – date of birth August 4, 1961) and the parents are married at the time of birth and the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the U.S. or its territories for a period of at least ten years at some time in his or her life prior to the birth, at least five of which were after his or her 14th birthday.”
“Status as a natural-born citizen of the United States is one of the eligibility requirements established in the United States Constitution for election to the office of President or Vice President. This requirement was intended to protect the nation from foreign influence. The Constitution does not define the phrase natural-born citizen, and various opinions have been offered over time regarding its precise meaning. A 2011 Congressional Research Service report stated: The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term “natural born” citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship “by birth” or “at birth”, either by being born “in” the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to alien parents; by being born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents; or by being born in other situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship “at birth”. Such term, however, would not include a person who was not a U.S. citizen by birth or at birth, and who was thus born an “alien” required to go through the legal process of “naturalization” to become a U.S. citizen.”
And before anyone says anything about my use of tea bag allow me to give you a history about their chosen symbol: On January 19, 2009, Graham Makohoniuk, a part-time trader and a member of Ticker Forum, posted a casual invitation on the market-ticker.org forums to “Mail a tea bag to congress and to senate…The TEA BAG PARTY wrote: Please tell your friends and neighbors about the Tea Bag Protest Party. Today! This is a grass roots movement that relies on your participation for success…After you send your tea bag protest letter please register your protest here. This step is completely optional, but will help to ensure that your message is not ignored by Washington and the Media. For each individual tea bag protest that is registered here, we will also add another tea bag of our own to a large bundle of them that will be used for a public protest ceremony in the near future. TeaBagParty.org was conceived by a small business person who has been working day and night to keep the business running and people employed for the past 7 years.”
Paul Mc says
Hey Proud,
You have already been proven wrong about the Tea Party name in another thread, yet you continue to use the derogatory term. Isn’t that an ad hominem attack that you so frequently complain about?
Anyways, have a nice day.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
Only in your on mind.
Paul Mc says
Actually, it was right here on the Dagger.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
Put there by you. There is an old saying for you, it goes something like this: REPETENS ALIQUID (AUT DICENS ESSE PROLIXIUS TENDEBATUR), NON FACIT VERA. “Repeating something (or saying it louder) does not make it true.”
Paul Mc says
Hey Proud,
All you ever do is repeat the many of the same lies over and over again.
Anyways…
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
PAUL: Prove it.
Paul Mc says
Hey Proud,
You want me to prove that you posted that exact same comment about the tea party?
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
It was true then and it is still true. Prove it wrong pal
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
Here is something else I wrote that you can enjoy: “You are so correct when you say I use the term to annoy the hypocrites of the Tea Party. Their foul, disgusting posters and hate filled rants so repulsed me that I can’t help but rub their collective noses into their own ignorant choice of terms. Michelle Bachmann used a tea bag on March 11, 2011! You do know she is their poster child? As soon as they stop their racism and lies, I will stop referring to them by their own symbol. I make no apologies either!”
Paul Mc says
Hey Proud,
You seem to be the one full of hate. Seriously. WHy all the hate? Aren’t the Democrats supposed to be the party of inclusion and acceptance, not hate and intolerance?
Now, as for your request. I already did so in the other thread. Look it up, you will see.
B says
Paul, she is clearly angry and lashing out at conservatives: daddy issues? However, she is small potatoes. Look at the front page of the Washington post. At NBCnews. At ABC news. Liberals on the attack everywhere. No focus on how badly Obama is screwing up, but Romeny speaks a truth and the libs scream the sky is falling. It is not about the country for liberals, it is about staying in power.
You have a nice day.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
PAUL: Except your “proof” was not valid or true. Sorry you’ll have to do better.
Paul Mc says
Hey Proud,
Actually, what I stated was true and it was valid.
What you stated was neither true, nor valid.
Anyways, have a nice day.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
PAUL: Tell that to your star tea bagger: “I brought a tea bag today and wondered if anyone cared for tea,” Bachmann joked at Granite State Patriots Liberty PAC fundraiser in Barrington, while holding a tea bag out in front of the crowd. March 12, 2011.”
Paul Mc says
Hey Proud,
Ok, so let me get this straight. If someone ever holds a tea bag, they are a tea-bagger? Have you ever drank tea, Proud? Wouldn’t that make you a tea-bagger as well? You shall hence forth be known as Proud to be a Tea-Bagger!
So it is written, so it shall be!
Anyways….
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
Everyone that holds a tea bag at a tea party event is a tea bagger. I’m happy that you are beginning to understand dude. It was a long road for you to see the truth.
Paul Mc says
Hey Proud,
Dude, and since you hold a tea bag when you make tea, you pal, are a tea-bagger! Congratz Proud to be a Tea-Bagger!
Anyways…
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
PAUL: You are so lame. I am laughing now.
Paul Mc says
Hey Proud to be a Tea-Bagger,
Dude, pal, you are so lame, I am laughing now! So there!
Anyways…
Bruce O'H. says
I don’t involve myself in the “birther” issue. I’m involved in removing and replacing every Leftist/Progressive in either Party, no matter where they were born.
As for the other, the issue is not about the use of the term “tea bag”, as you well know, but about the term, “teabagger”, which has a vile meaning culled from the lexicon of homosexuals.
In using it against ones political opponents, one is channeling Alinsky to diminish and humiliate those opponents and their views.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
Bruce is completely unaware of the meaning of Irony.
Bruce O'H. says
Only a person who is truly insecure about their own intelligence, would denigrate the intelligence of others so much.
Your comments only appear intellectually superior to your own overinflated ego.
You haven’t shown me anything yet.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
Bruce I don’t have to denigrate your intelligence when you do such a good job of it yourself.
Bruce O'H. says
…and you STILL haven’t shown me anything yet in intelligence. Just schoolyard grade jibes. Puny minded little man. I feel sorry for you.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
“Sorry, I have better things to do. You’ll have to rage with your tea bag brethren.”
Mesta says
Absolutely no concept of the mmeaning of irony.
AND,…he has tailored his definition of Fascism to exclude himself from those ranks by omitting key identifying factors. When one of the key components he has omitted he displays in subsequent a comment.
“I’m involved in removing and replacing every Leftist/Progressive in either Party, no matter where they were born.”
Can’t tolerate any dissenting views from his opinion therefore, he must remove all dissenters from society, huh?
That statement is the epitomy of autocracy and absolutism.
“Democrats, the Party of tolerance. Unless you disagree with them…then it’s “SHUT THE F— UP YOU LYING, RACIST, HATER.”
No wonder nobody likes them.”
Here’s the typical despotic rant. Don’t expose my true intent by calling me what I truly am. Where’s the anger coming from. Sounds like him.
Jose Vela says
Mesta, thank you and Bruce O. and others for your comments regarding Obama and leftists. I came to this country to improve my lifestyle, not to fall victim to government slavery. I want the chance to improve, not to live off the government.
Q says
But if your papers aren’t in order, the Right will send you right back where you came from. So keep supporting their policies.
Bear says
Q,
And if his papers are not in order, rightly so.
Mike Welsh says
Yes indeed. We welcome all comers to the USA who come here the correct way. Jose sounds like an individual who wants to succeed the correct way, not by illegal or unethical means. If that is the case I wish him success in all his endeavors.
THANKS FOR ELECTING ME TO CONGRESS says
Incredeeeblaaay. Heeese eeenglish eees eeemproving as he types.
THANKS FOR ELECTING ME TO CONGRESS says
BRUCE, BRUCE, BRUCE. Teabagging means putting your balls in someone’s mouth, dog. Doesn’t have to be one dude putting his balls in another dude’s mouth. Could be a dude putting his balls up ina chick’s mouth. Viz: “Dude, I teabagged her.” So the term is not germain to the world of scary gays.
Bruce O'H. says
The fact that you would even consider posting such a comment in a public forum is shocking to me. It also strengthens my resolve to get ALL of your vile side out of office. You represent the total lack of morals and any care for societal norms, or common courtesy, that is endemic of the Left.
But, you feel empowered to make such a statement out of some sick and false sense of “social morality”.
We WILL remove your side from power and relegate you back to the kook fringe of the gutters that you crawled out from.
THANKS FOR ELECTING ME TO CONGRESS says
EVERYONE, BRUCE IS SHOCKED!!!!!
Bruce, it is not vile if one man wants to put his balls in another man’s mouth, so long as they love one another and file joint income tax returns, ok? At least we can agree on that.
Jose Vela says
you need to live in Mexico or some other places. you are not a good citizen. you trash
thephantompatriot says
So Harris gets an award from a lobbying organization that promotes small business, big deal… meanwhile in the world of important news, he has voted for NDAA & renewal of The Patriot Act among other things. You gotta love how he paid lip-service to the Constitution in order to get elected and then once he’s in he has complete disregard for the oath that he took. Typical politician.
Bruce O'H. says
Democrats, the Party of tolerance. Unless you disagree with them…then it’s “SHUT THE F— UP YOU LYING, RACIST, HATER.”
No wonder nobody likes them.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
Well Bruce, in this case the shoes DOES fit.
ALEX R says
Even they couldn’t tolerate Wendy Rosen. Although they sure would like to have tolerated her. Not hearing much from the New Democratic Party guy these days. I guess he is busy looking for a place to hide his face.
Will Wendy Rosen be indicted? There would be no end to the howl to have her lynched before sundown if she were a Republican.
She’s your candidate, PTBL, any defense of her?
PROUD TO BE AN IDIOT says
Proud to be Liberal, your my hero.
PROUD TO BE LIBERAL says
you’re Not too bright are you?
THANKS FOR ELECTING ME TO CONGRESS says
NOW WHERE IS MY FREE GOVERNMENT HEALTH CARE?
Jose Vela says
To Mr. Q., my papers are legal as I am. If not, I should be sent away. USA have a goverment of law, not a goverment of dictator. If you are American you should be proud, but you not. I do not understand.
Q says
You assume far too much.
Jose Vela says
Mr.Q., why you so down on people in your country?
Watcher says
What are you talking about?