• About The Dagger
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

The Dagger - Local News with an Edge

  • Local
  • Politics
  • Schools
  • Sirens
  • Health/Food
  • A&E
  • Sports
You are here: Home / Local / Presbyterian Home of Maryland Announces Harford’s First Continuing Care Retirement Community on Fountain Green Road

Presbyterian Home of Maryland Announces Harford’s First Continuing Care Retirement Community on Fountain Green Road

December 3, 2013 By Dagger News Service 45 Comments

From Presbyterian Home of Maryland:

[Towson, Maryland] December 3, 2013 – Presbyterian Home of Maryland, a faith-based not-for-profit organization, plans to develop the first continuing care retirement community (CCRC) in Harford County on a property located on Fountain Green Road in Bel Air.

The new Presbyterian Home community will offer residents ages 60 and up a variety of living choices ranging from apartments to single villa homes in a neighborhood setting. All residents will enjoy access to dining, housekeeping, maintenance and grounds keeping services as well as scheduled transportation to area shopping and activities. Planned amenities include multiple dining facilities and a pub, a wellness and fitness center, a convenience market and billiards, cards and library areas.

Unlike other senior communities, a CCRC provides a continuum of care on one campus including independent living apartments and villas, in home care, comprehensive nursing services, assisted living and memory support. Dietary and healthy-living counseling and case management services including supportive care, visitation and counseling will also be available to residents. Visit Carlton Senior Living to get all the details.

“Presbyterian Home of Maryland has a strong legacy of providing compassionate care for seniors for over 130 years,” said Susan Shea, president and CEO of Presbyterian Home of Maryland. “We look forward to creating a new community to meet the evolving expectations of today’s seniors and to expand our mission to Harford County, which we believe is underserved in retirement living options.”

Director of Harford County Economic Development Jim Richardson is an enthusiastic supporter of the project, saying, Presbyterian Home is an outstanding organization which has been working for several years to bring their first class facility to Harford County. I couldn’t be more pleased that our citizens will have the opportunity to stay near their family and friends as they move into retirement, and know that Presbyterian Home will provide a quality, caring and healthy venue. You can visit https://www.wilshirehomehealthcc.org/home-health/ to get more information.

To learn more about Presbyterian Home of Maryland, please visit www.presbyterianhomeofmd.org.

####

About Presbyterian Home of Maryland, Inc.: Since 1883, Presbyterian Home of Maryland, a faith-based not-for-profit charitable organization, has served adults of all faith by providing retirement living and health care through a continuum of life in a warm and caring environment. Headquartered in Towson, Maryland, Presbyterian Home of Maryland is dedicated to superb service and the values of dignity, trust and independence.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

About Dagger News Service

Send Us Your News
tellus@daggerpress.com

Comments

  1. none says

    December 3, 2013 at 6:58 pm

    I hope this isn’t a tax exempt organization. They need to pay the county taxes same as everyone else.

    Log in to Reply
    • Tudor Manor says

      December 4, 2013 at 6:23 am

      Yes it is a tax exempt organization. The same one that wanted to build in Aberdeen but pulled the project because they could not get additional tax breaks.

      Log in to Reply
  2. Tudor Manor says

    December 3, 2013 at 8:51 pm

    This is clearly a press release written by the CCRC. The whole story needs to be told here. There is much much more. Key facts missing:
    1. The CCRC will have nearly 700 units contained in four story buildings on only 58.5 acres. In addition to the CCRC, there will also be 120 single family homes on lots less than 1/4 acre in size. There will be in total over 800 residential units.
    2. The CCRC is a major commercial operation (in middle of residential neighborhoods) that will bring increased traffic from among other things visitors, employees and delivery trucks.
    3. Two purely residential streets, previously dead ends, will be opened: Falstaff Road and Cloverfield Court. While Falstaff is proposed to only be opened to emergency traffic, Cloverfield Court will serve as a shortcut for CCRC traffic seeking to avoid already congested Route 22 and Route 543. There are no guarantees that Falstaff will not suffer the same fate.
    4. A nursing facility is planned to be built a mere 80 feet from residential homes with little buffer.
    5. The single family homes will be conveniently placed right next door to homes on .5 to 1 acre lots again with little buffer.

    The bottom line is that this project, while noble in its goals, is not the nice little senior home as portrayed above. This project, as currently laid out, will significantly impact the property values of the homes surrounding it and only add to traffic headaches that already plague Route 22 and Route 543 as noted in County traffic studies and reports. Public safety is a major concern at many intersections along 543.

    The high density project is able to build where it is due to inexplicable zoning regulations that carve out specific exception for CCRCs on low density zoned property such as the farm in question which is zoned R1. Actually they are not inexplicable once you get to know the players involved and the politics.

    The surrounding neighborhoods are intensely opposed to this project and are mobilizing an effort to contest it.

    Finally, there is a Community Input Meeting on Monday, December 9th at 6:00 pm at Southampton Middle School the one and only chance the public will get to voice concerns about the project.

    Log in to Reply
    • TR says

      December 4, 2013 at 11:37 am

      I remember when the stretch from Fountain Green to Hickory was farm and forest on both sides of 543. Seems rather hypocritical for nearby residents of places such as Tudor Manor, Amyclae, Hampton Ridge etc. to be complaining (many of whom are doing so with thick Baltimore city/county accents).

      This location is, after all, within the county’s designated development envelope. Certainly there are traffic concerns that would have to be addressed here, and if they can’t be adequately mitigated then by all means deny the project. But I always get a kick when people in developments complain about development.

      Log in to Reply
      • The Money Tree says

        December 4, 2013 at 11:41 am

        I don’t live there but I do understand your suggestion with a caveat – google map that area and look at the way the neighborhoods are aligned. I doubt the neighbors would care if it were development something akin to what’s there already and I’m sure they all expected it would eventually go that way, but what we have here are a series of 4 story seemingly commercial sized structures housing 650 apartments. That is apples and oranges on steroids.

        Log in to Reply
        • disgusted says

          December 4, 2013 at 12:07 pm

          Of course commercial structure would look out of place… till of course you look at the county building on the adjoining property with it’s neighbor the verizon building not to mention the shopping center and currently remodeling burgerking, WAWA and royal farm with C Milton Wright just a few hundred yards in the other direction.

          Yes, it is obvious you don’t live there.

          Log in to Reply
          • The Money Tree says

            December 4, 2013 at 12:39 pm

            We’re talking about the neighborhood here – you know the actual property surrounding the proposed site that actually touches and borders here. The shopping center is nearly a mile and the high school half a mile. With all due respect that makes no sense.

          • disgusted says

            December 4, 2013 at 12:57 pm

            One more time dolt…. the county building “ACTUALLY TOUCHES” the proposed site and is next to the verizon building with all those tree trimming trucks in the parking lot with the booms extended . And you might want to check your ability to measure things the shopping center is maybe 100 yards from the property being divided….

            You really are clueless.

          • The Money Tree says

            December 4, 2013 at 1:10 pm

            Verizon building and county building are not obtrusive, both being single story brick structures that can be blocked by clever landscraping. Kinda hard to block a 4 story building. Even you as argumentative as you are have to recognize there’s a world of difference between a 4 story vs. 1 story building.

          • disgusted says

            December 4, 2013 at 1:35 pm

            Yes a 1 story existing ugly commercial block building is much more appealing than a structure you have no clue of it’s appearance but you are sure it’s gonna be uglier.

            Clueless….

      • Sassy axie says

        December 9, 2013 at 6:47 pm

        TR…what accent do you speak with? Either way, anyone with an intelligent mind can see that cronyism was at play here. Further, said intelligent minds also realize tat the area us simply not suitable to such a large scale endeavor, this would fit better in areas with far less congestion/traffic.

        Log in to Reply
        • Keith Gabel says

          December 10, 2013 at 9:40 am

          Be careful, if you mention traffic concerns, many people who troll this board will accuse you of being a socialist, against the rule of law, against private property rights, afraid of development etc.

          However, if the die has already been cast, and it sounds like it has, your only option may be to bring your concerns to the State Highway Administration, as that body is the one responsible for turning your bad situation into something less bad, at least as traffic is concerned.

          Good luck.

          Log in to Reply
    • Tudor mom says

      December 29, 2013 at 10:47 am

      community input meeting is January 6 at 6pm at Southampton middle school
      If you want to make a comment get there early to sign in

      Log in to Reply
  3. Tudor Manor says

    December 3, 2013 at 8:59 pm

    I want to emphasize that there is a Community Input Meeting on Monday, December 9th at 6:00 pm at Southampton Middle School the one and only chance the public will get to voice concerns about the project. And anyone who lives along or travels along Routes 543 and Route 22 should be concerned.

    Log in to Reply
    • The Money Tree says

      December 4, 2013 at 8:33 am

      We need people to show up beyond the lady from Friends of Harford. Citizens need to band together even in cases where the development won’t directly affect them. It’s our county, these are our neighborhoods and we owe it to our neighbors to help in these situations. When the rules are being stretched to shoe horn these projects where they don’t belong it’s up to us to stop it.

      Log in to Reply
  4. Bil says

    December 4, 2013 at 7:47 am

    All of the Tudor Manor folks need to remember that their hundreds of homes took Harford farmland also. This is a great use for this property zoning despite what the nimby folks are saying. I want to retire here in the County.

    Log in to Reply
    • The Money Tree says

      December 4, 2013 at 8:13 am

      And nobody is stopping you as there are already plenty of housing options and given a more appropriate location this project might still be built. Ruining the neighborhood for everyone that lives there so that you have a crappy boxed sized apartment one day is selfish. It’s out of scale to the surrounding neighborhood, in an already overly taxed traffic area, and only apparently legal due to a glitch in the zoning status. Maybe move it over to the Walmart site on Plumtree where it would be more appropriate.

      Log in to Reply
      • disgusted says

        December 4, 2013 at 8:32 am

        Why would someone build on valuable business zoned property something that can be built on less expensive residential zoned?

        You are a dolt.

        Log in to Reply
        • The Money Tree says

          December 4, 2013 at 8:34 am

          And you are clearly associated with either a developer or working inside the current administration’s corrupt planning and zoning department.

          Log in to Reply
          • disgusted says

            December 4, 2013 at 8:55 am

            Been going on in zoning for years in many more places than Harford county. Take a ride down lovely rural Glen Arm Rd and check out Glen Meadows in the middle of farm country another Presbyterian community. It’s an absolutely beautiful place impeccably maintained. Your conspiracy mental condition makes reality your enemy.

            Dolt.

          • The Money Tree says

            December 4, 2013 at 9:02 am

            So to date we know you like 650 apartment in the Amyclae subdivision and a Walmart smack dab in the middle of another neighborhood and out of scale to it’s neighbors. The landscaping or maintenance done at Presbyterian has nothing to do with it’s appropriateness in that location.

          • disgusted says

            December 4, 2013 at 9:16 am

            What you should know I like capitalism and small government 2 things you know nothing about.

          • The Money Tree says

            December 4, 2013 at 9:29 am

            As do I but at the same time an unfettered free for all when it comes to development and that ignores the appropriateness or the affect on the quality of life of citizens helps no one. Question to ask yourself anytime you support a project is if you would want it next door. If not, then to crow about it is hypocritical and disingenuous. Used to be developers and builders came from the towns they developed. That way they were impacted by activities, had to face their neighbors and so citizens had a say and a voice in what happened around them and generally approved. Today developers seldom live where they build and frankly don’t care what they leave for the people forced to look and live at what’s left behind.

          • The money turd says

            December 4, 2013 at 9:42 am

            In what world is the new Walmart smack dab in the middle of a neighborhood. The current Walmart has more houses around it. The Harford mall is closer to houses. Not one residential property touches the new Walmart site. No residential zoning touches this property. The nursing home is the closest residents and it’s not in residential zoning.

          • The Money Tree says

            December 4, 2013 at 9:46 am

            Bet you used to hold your finger an inch from your little sister’s face and taunt her such as “not touching” but we all know as did she that it was just as bad. Surrounding proximity and inability to move freely without said finger being in the way is about the same thing. You need to be sent to time out in your room once again.

  5. Nose picka, and Cookie eata says

    December 4, 2013 at 8:07 am

    Mmmhmmm, ill take bets there won’t be any shortage of those who refuse to get Maryland LISCENSE plates for their big fancy, stylish foreign automobiles buying up those “starting in the low 300’s,” quickly built, and crammed in somewhere its hard to fit a pushmower between to mow the grass.

    I’ll venture to assume these are those same out of staties who fly up behind you on a back road put of nowhere and ride 2″ behind your rear bumper, who cut through parking lots at intersections because the traffic light is too slow, who refuse to switch lanes when a line of cars are trying to merge. Don’t forget about ignoring traffic signal colors.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Arturro Nasney says

    December 4, 2013 at 10:00 am

    Somebody go ask the Aberdeen City council what developed there. By the time they were finally told no for the last time Pres Homes tucked tail and ran. It was a lousy use of land then and it is a lousy use of land now. There may well be a need for more Assisted/nursing care in the county but we can do better that Pres Homes. Susan Shea was a very smooth talking agent for this then and is certainly no better now.

    Log in to Reply
  7. Tudor Manor says

    December 4, 2013 at 10:35 am

    I would like to clarify the position of the surrounding neighborhoods. I think we get that the farm is not going to remain a farm forever. The problem we have is that the proposed development was basically shoved down our throats. To PHM’s credit, they do show some willingness to trim around the edges. However, this plan requires a complete overhaul to protect property values (Purpose of the zoning code as stated in the preamble) and to minimize traffic and safety issues (another stated purpose of the zoning code).

    What is being rejected by the neighborhoods is the plan as currently presented. NOT necessarily the concept of a CCRC. The plan as represented is a complete and total disaster for the surrounding community. Could the community embrace a revised plan? Maybe. But it will take significant changes not just trimming around the edges.

    The community representatives need to be invited to MRA, sit around the table for eight hours or whatever it takes, and redraw the blue prints in such a way that this project is not a lopsided loss for the surrounding neighbors and a huge win for the landowners, developers, and David Craig & co. Good faith dealings require as much.

    This does not have to be a Walmart type fight.

    At the end of the day, the biggest losers – 1. PHM and the seniors who are going to be demonized if the project goes through as planned and 2. David Craig who is running for governor with his ties to the project. He WILL lose several thousand votes if he allows this as is.

    Here is a FACT that is NOT widely known. On October 1, 2013, David Craig introduced a seemingly random bill at the time that changed the maximum allowable height of buildings for CCRCs from 50 feet to four stories. That bill became law on November 5th. On or our about November 5th, the same day that change became law, plans for the CCRC became public as the lawyer for the project filed notice of the Community Input Meeting. Low and behold the plans for the CCRC call for four story buildings. Coincidently, that lawyer who also happens to sit on the board for the Presbyterian Homes is David Craig’s campaign advisor. Hmmmm!!! Think about that. And you wonder why the neighborhoods are so upset.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Tudor Manor says

    December 4, 2013 at 10:56 am

    Again I want to restate my last paragraph. This is verifiable fact:
    On October 1, 2013, David Craig introduced a seemingly random bill at the time that changed the maximum allowable height of buildings for CCRCs from 50 feet to four stories. That bill became law on November 5th. On or our about that VERY same day, plans for the CCRC became public as the lawyer for the project filed notice of the Community Input Meeting. Low and behold the plans for the CCRC call for four story buildings. Coincidently, that lawyer who also happens to sit on the board for the Presbyterian Homes is David Craig’s campaign advisor. Hmmmm!!! Think about that. And you wonder why the neighborhoods are so upset.

    Log in to Reply
  9. Concerned Citizen says

    December 4, 2013 at 11:06 am

    Nothing is ever random when it comes to David Craig and his administration. I recall some legislation passed a few years ago that was introduced without a governing board’s knowedge under the guise that it was just “clean up.” Needless to say, it was a lot more than that. If Harford Countians only knew the kind of business that is conducted by our elected officials and their appointees they would be sick.

    Log in to Reply
  10. The Money Tree says

    December 4, 2013 at 11:19 am

    David Craig has been running this county under the delusion he’s some sort of boss hog. I’m embarrassed that this is the best we as republicans have come up with. Please Mr. Glassman reestablish some standards and ethics in our government.

    Log in to Reply
    • Frustrated Citizen says

      December 4, 2013 at 1:17 pm

      The most insulting thing about that revelation is the arrogance involved. It did not take a lot of digging to verify that comment. The whole thing was done in plain sight. Those two clearly gamed the system to their benefit and to the detriment of the public they are supposed to serve. Changing the zoning code on the eve of announcing plans for a development that those code changes benefit is not in the spirit of fair dealing among other things to say the least. Shame on them!! Shame on us for trusting them and not following mundane things like zoning code changes!!!

      Log in to Reply
      • The Money Tree says

        December 4, 2013 at 1:27 pm

        I hate to say it but you have to look at the elephant in the room – why would Craig risk his reputation pushing all these development projects if he wasn’t getting some personal benefit?

        Log in to Reply
        • gertie says

          January 6, 2014 at 11:13 pm

          Who has deeper pockets for campaign funding—developers or ordinary citizens? And is there any politician that really worries about his reputation? Doesn’t seem like it in Harford Co. when they so brazenly push through their own agendas.

          Log in to Reply
  11. John P. Mallamo says

    December 4, 2013 at 12:32 pm

    Does anybody know whether this project will be a a TIF or just an extension of the no property tax process that was pursued in Aberdeen? Just curious how much it will cost the taxpayers of Harford County for this wonderful opportunity.

    Why can’t Harford County attract a business that comes in and volunteers to help out by paying more in real, personal and income taxes than they ask residents to give them to move? Just wondering?

    John P. Malllamo

    Log in to Reply
    • Tudor Manor says

      December 4, 2013 at 1:25 pm

      We do not know of any tax credit help requested at this time. That will come from two places:

      1. The state – Wayne Norman has some say in that aspect. Nothing there yet.

      2. The County – Guess who is involved with that David Craig and Richard Slutsky. The good thing here is that if it gets brought up in the council, the people will have an opportunity to speak. Nothing here either yet.. . .yet.

      Keep in mind that the Aberdeen project was entirely dependent on the state promised tax credits that were subsequently pulled by Mary James Dulaney. This is all per news stories from the time and the feasibility study for the project filed with the MD Department Aging.

      The tax credit issue is going to be a major MAJOR issue with the surrounding residents who would be essentially subsidizing that with reduced property values. That said, the entire county should take issue with it.

      Log in to Reply
      • TR says

        December 4, 2013 at 4:02 pm

        Mary James Dulaney?

        Log in to Reply
        • Tudor Manor says

          December 4, 2013 at 5:41 pm

          I stand corrected – Mary-Dulany James. Almost had it. Sorry.

          Log in to Reply
      • John P. Mallamo says

        December 5, 2013 at 8:10 am

        Mr./Mrs./Ms/ Tudor Manor

        Sir, Ma’am thank you for the information on Tax Credits.

        The TIF is entirely local. Looking at the situation it would certainly fit within the Harford County’s use of the TIF process.

        It does seem more than just curious that the President and CEO of Presbyterian Homes stated that it is too early to determine whether tax credits will be pursued. Odd, too, that the Harford County’s Director of Economic Development is quoted this early in the process, on the benefits of the arrival of Presbyterian Homes to the County. It would seem to be more than just coincidental that counsel for the project has a successful track record at securing County funding for developmental projects.

        Seems that the decision has already been made, only issue is when to announce to the public that we will be paying and how much we will be paying.

        Your thoughts, please.

        John P. Mallamo

        Log in to Reply
        • Tudor Manor says

          December 5, 2013 at 10:37 am

          Mr. Mallamo, I believe you are far more in tune with the TIF process than we are at this point judging from your excellent contributions to other pieces on the Dagger related to the mysterious inner workings of our county government. Unfortunately, we have not been paying as much attention to our government and now find ourselves in this predicament. Lesson learned. Shame on us. We are now getting a crash course and getting up to speed. I would love to enlist your expertise in what I think is going be a lengthy fight that will benefit no one in the end.

          Log in to Reply
  12. Bill says

    December 5, 2013 at 7:30 am

    To top it off, Craig just appointed the project’s attorney’s wife to a position in his administration. Between the Water Street property buy at top value for his supporters and this, I am suprised the Baltimore press has not caught on to this O’Malley-like corruption.

    Log in to Reply
    • Tudor Manor says

      December 5, 2013 at 9:41 am

      Can you point me to some sources on the appointment and the Water Street deal? Can’t seem to find that in print anywhere.

      Log in to Reply
    • Tudor Manor says

      December 5, 2013 at 10:24 am

      I did find where the wife is an assistant to the director in the County procurement department if you look at the employee directory. Surely there was some nepotism there. Not sure how much power she actually wields. Although in that position, I am sure she is privy to information that could be helpful to certain individuals.

      Log in to Reply
  13. Irate citizen!!! says

    December 5, 2013 at 3:26 pm

    More from David Craig & Co. The change to CCRC zoning code was NOT the only beneficial zoning change they pushed through on the eve of announcing the development plans. They also changed the code section dealing with Natural Resources Districts. Under old code, if 30% or more of a property constituted an NRD, then for certain purposes the usable land could be bumped up to the next designation of density. In this case from R1 to R2. WELL now Craig & Co. reduced the percentage to 25%. And you guessed it . . . the developer is seeking just such a bump up on this property. Hmmm. . I wonder if the percentage of NRD on the property is a number between 25% and 30%.

    But wait there is more . . . they also changed a third zoning code section, presumably for their own benefit. Why stop at just two??? They extended the time plan approvals were valid to three years.

    Joking aside this is a serious serious ethical issue. Coming from a man who has his sights on running for governor. I want to write more but I am absolutely speechless on this.

    Log in to Reply
  14. Vietnam Vet says

    December 29, 2013 at 1:33 pm

    Some one said, build it & they will come. It’s time to stop building & they will quit coming.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply to The Money Tree Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sounding Off

  • “I can't wait to see what is in these emails that Bob is not wanting to share.”

    Bob Watch | Harford County Sheriff’s Office: Cassilly Administration in Violation of Maryland Public Information Act

  • “I like Gahler as well but don't forget he is backing his Sgt.Pennman who sits on the County Council. Pennman…”

    Lalta Durbal | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “This Cassilly/Penman spat I believe was initiated, at least in part, by the possibility of public housing projects being built…”

    Open Your Eyes | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “A plat revision reducing the number of lots is hardly worth you weeing your shorts over.”

    The Money Tree | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “You do know there is a system in the county called “Fast Track”. Ask your buddy Euler, he’s already used…”

    The Money Tree | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “Nothing at all suspicious about a property that has sat around for generations and then gets approved in record pace…”

    Bob Watch | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “The supposed development that everyone is referring to goes back generations. When 95 was built there were lots created by…”

    Dragonman | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “Right you are. Pretty comical that Bob Cassilly has a business registered at his home address that is not his…”

    Bob Watch | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “Quite a display of clownsmanship from Penman at last nights council meeting. Is he off his meds? You’re not in…”

    The Money Tree | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “I don’t have a dog in the fight regarding the Cassilly v. Penman conflict. I hope it is resolved in…”

    Open Your Eyes | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “Shenanigans? You’re hilarious.”

    The Money Tree | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “Yeah, that's the whole point. He is not any other county resident, he is the county executive and he and…”

    Happy Bob Real Estate | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “The amount of disinformation here is staggering. The land that is owned by Bobs family was actually platted for 14…”

    Dragonman | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “$145,000 for a part-time job and then demand more money? Pretty cushy spot he's in...maybe he needs to spend his…”

    The Money Tree | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “Cassilly makes way over 145k and in fact took a cola double of what he gave county employees. You are…”

    JJ | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “@money tree OMG! Penman is paid the same sergeant's salary that every one else earns and a rate that is…”

    Where there is Smoke | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “Good lord man, go back and read the claim being made. You folks are all over the map. First it's…”

    The Money Tree | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “@Money Tree Since you are so much in the know, Did Bob authorize the Administrator to sign as Bob Cassilly,…”

    Where there is Smoke | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “All that money must have you high. No one said executive forged a document. It is Bob claiming someone else…”

    Bob Watch | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “I will repeat - you are aware that any approvals for development go through various county agencies to ensure whatever…”

    The Money Tree | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “He had plats expedited and also some things allowed to get more lots. His Planning Advisory Board appointee Amy O’Neil…”

    JJ | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “Claiming the county executive forged a document could wind you up in civil court if you care to say that…”

    The Money Tree | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “You must be Bob with the name money tree since it seems to be raining down money on you and…”

    Bob Watch | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “Ethics complaint stating Cassilly signed off on a plat for development that involves his family which has already been easily…”

    The Money Tree | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

  • “I read the Aegis article and it looks like Penman made his ethics complaint on Feb. 14 and Cassilly made…”

    Bob Watch | Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly

Recent Posts

  • Trio Arrested In Connection With Alleged Assault, Kidnapping In Darlington March 17, 2025
  • 3P: “Developers’ Exploitation Led to Missed Opportunity for Harford County” December 19, 2024
  • 3P Protect Perryman Peninsula: Developers Exploit Horse Training Facility to Push Illegal Freight Terminal Project September 5, 2024
  • Arrest Made in Aberdeen Triple Homicide; Victims Identified April 30, 2024
  • Harford County Sheriff’s Office: Cassilly Administration in Violation of Maryland Public Information Act March 25, 2024
  • Harford County Executive Cassilly: “Once Again I Find Myself in the Position of Having to Fend Off Personal Attacks” March 20, 2024
  • Councilmember Penman Named as Subject of Harford Ethics Probe; Responds with Attacks on County Executive Cassilly February 28, 2024
  • Harford County to Purchase Land of Abandoned Eva Mar Development for New Public School in Bel Air February 27, 2024
  • Harford County Executive Cassilly Initiates Legislation for Comprehensive Zoning Review February 22, 2024
  • Edgewood Man Pleads Guilty to 1st Degree Murder February 22, 2024
  • Violent Carjacking in Aberdeen Leaves Man Injured; Victim Clings to Hood as Stolen Car Speeds Away February 17, 2024
  • Bel Air Man Found Guilty of Rape, Sex Offense, Assault; Faces Immigration Consequences February 9, 2024
  • Harford County Councilman Penman: “King Cassilly’s Intent is to Bully the County Council and Mislead our Community Members” February 6, 2024
  • Harford County Executive Bob Cassilly Announces Opposition to Legislation Allowing Freestanding Accessory Dwelling Units in Residential Areas January 16, 2024
  • Harford’s Cassilly Delivers State of the County Address: Redirecting Government to Serve People; No Tax Increases, Public Safety Upgrades, New County Parks January 12, 2024
  • Confrontation Leads to Gunshot, Murder in Bel Air December 30, 2023
  • Woman Charged with 1st-Degree Assault for Threatening Rental Company Employees in Aberdeen December 19, 2023
  • Edgewood Man Pleads Guilty to Attempted Rape and Intent to Distribute Cocaine December 11, 2023
  • Mother Charged with Homicide in Death of 3-Yr-Old Son in Bel Air December 4, 2023
  • Longtime Employee of Harford County Manufacturer Sentenced to 42 Months in Federal Prison for $20 Million Kickback Scheme December 1, 2023

Archives

Extras

  • About The Dagger
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Sign up for The Daily Dagger Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to The Daily Dagger and receive new articles by email.

Copyright © 2025 ·Dagger Press LLC · Log in

%d